FacebookTwitterYoutubeInstagramGoogle Plus

Smart Reads: Mark Avery’s ‘A Message from Martha’


How was the world’s most abundant bird driven to extinction in less than a century? That’s the core question British naturalist Mark Avery asks in his new book, A Message from Martha: The Extinction of the Passenger Pigeon and Its Relevance TodayAs the 100th anniversary of the death of Martha, the last living passenger pigeon, approaches this September, we got a chance to chat with Avery about how the pigeons’ biology played a part in their extinction, how the conservation movement has developed since Martha’s demise, and what species loss says about our own humanity:

(Note: This interview has been lightly edited for clarity and length.)

WSF: Passenger pigeons numbered in the billions across their habitat in the eastern United States; they gathered and nested in such large groups that their flocks blocked out the sun. And yet their population nose-dived with almost inconceivable speed, and we happen to know the exact moment when the entire species went extinct. What were the primary forces behind their decline?

MA: Cutting down half of the USA’s forests by 1870 was the main factor. Passenger pigeons nested in forests, roosted in forests, and fed on the fruits of the forest: acorns, beech mast [nuts of the beech tree], and chestnuts. But we followed that up with an industrialized slaughter of the birds—mostly for food, but also for sport—and this was aided by the invention of the telegraph, the spread of the railroads, better firearms, and the lack of regulation of hunting. It was a slaughter rather than a harvest. Trainloads of millions of passenger pigeons were sent from Wisconsin and Michigan back east to the restaurants of New York and Philadelphia.

But I think it was the birds’ biology that made them vulnerable in the end. Passenger pigeons relied on ‘swamping’ natural predators when their numbers were high. When their numbers fell, they just couldn’t cope with the toll taken by hawks, raccoons, squirrels, falcons, bears, and other predators.

But that was in the wild. The last passenger pigeon, named Martha—who died in the Cincinnati Zoo on September 1, 1914—was captive-bred. It’s surprising that we didn’t do better in keeping a captive population alive. Then again, compared with the flocks of billions of birds darkening the skies, maybe a few birds in a cage would just have looked rather sad and pathetic.

WSF: At what point does a species lose the ability to regenerate their population? Do we know when that “tipping point” was reached with the passenger pigeon?

MA: The biology of the bird was important. Other species have been saved from extinction when there have only been a handful of individuals left alive. When the passenger pigeon was reduced to millions of birds rather than billions, however, I think the impact of natural predators overwhelmed them.

Their huge abundance made this tasty pigeon able to cope with great losses—there were never enough local predators really to dent the success of a colony with more than 100 million nests, but when the colonies were of millions, then local predators’ impacts were great enough to finish the species off. That’s what I think, but I’d love to have a time machine to be able to travel back and do the research to know if I’m right.

WSF: Did their sheer numbers lead farmers and hunters to believe, incorrectly, the pigeon population couldn’t be diminished by human factors?

MA: Yes. Europeans settling in North America arrived from a continent depleted of wildlife over centuries and arrived in one of great richness. No one thought that the passenger pigeon, or the beaver, or bison, or Eskimo curlew could ever be brought to the point of extinction. Also, consider that the passenger pigeon was nomadic—the great flocks of billions of birds sought out the areas that were rich in tree nuts—and these varied from year to year. Some years the pigeons would nest in New York and others in Wisconsin, so they were always a ‘here today and gone tomorrow’ bird, and it was less obvious that their numbers were falling. The passenger pigeon population went from at least three billion to zero in a matter of 60 years—an incredibly rapid decline.

WSF: In one part of the book, you relay a story about a young boy hunting near his family’s farm. He couldn’t identify the passenger pigeon he had shot and showed it to his mother. She instantly recalled seeing enormous flocks of them as a girl, but none since. How did this generation gap play into conservation movements?

MA: People missed the pigeons that they had seen in huge numbers in their youths. And at the same time bison, pronghorn and other species were being slaughtered too. It can be no coincidence that the National Parks movement, the Sierra Club, the Audubon Society, and the American Ornithologists’ Union all came into existence around this time. And leaders of the conservation movement, such as Aldo Leopold and John Muir, wrote and spoke about passenger pigeons.

WSF: What is the “message” that Martha offers in the book’s title?

MA: We aren’t better off because we drove the passenger pigeon to extinction. We are morally diminished by our role in its loss from the planet—the commonest bird the world has ever seen. If we had done better and saved it, we would be as rich and as happy as we are today, but wouldn’t have it on our conscience. And that applies to all the other species we have driven extinct or brought to the brink. A century ago, we could just about get away with saying we didn’t know what we were doing. Now we do know. We know enough. The question is: ‘Do we care enough?’ That is what Martha would ask us today.

Check out this excerpt from A Message from Martha, in which Avery describes ornithologist Alexander Wilson’s attempt to calculate the number of birds in one passenger pigeon population in the early 1800s:

Wilson’s estimate of the numbers in the single flock he saw in Kentucky one summer in the early nineteenth century (more than two billion) depended on an estimated flight speed of 60mph, a passage of birds of four hours, and a density of birds of three per square yard.  He then does the math correctly: 4 (hours) x 60 (mph) x 1760 (yards/mile) x 1760 (yards in width) x 3 (birds per square yard) = 2,230,272,000.  Wilson described this estimate of numbers as an ‘inconceivable multitude’ but also that the estimate was probably ‘far below the actual amount.’  From what Wilson wrote, a duration of four hours and a flock width of a mile were both likely to be underestimates rather than overestimates, and so we could regard this flock as likely to have numbered between two and three billion birds.  However perfect this estimate of this one flock might be, it is unlikely that Wilson watched all the passenger pigeons alive in the USA and Canada on that day in Kentucky. Was this flock half, or a quarter, or even a tenth of the total population of the species at that time?

Excerpted from A Message from Martha: The Extinction of the Passenger Pigeon and Its Relevance Today by Mark Avery. Copyright © 2014 by Mark Avery. With permission of the publisher, Bloomsbury USA. All rights reserved.



  1. Interesting exchange question about the gap between generations.  Are there other species that our children might not know about from our generation that we might be taking for granted, or has the digital age made sure those who want to be in the know, actually know?

  2. Be sure to check out the documentary funded on Kickstarter called From Billions to None about the same topic.

  3. There used to be hordes of squirrels migrating across the plains, too. I wonder what other animal populations have been decimated. Of course we have plenty of pigeons in NYC. I don’t know their species name.

  4. Lately when I observe a pesky rock dove,our common urban pigeon, chowing down on seed we leave out for songbirds, and feel a temptation to shoo her away, since reading about the 100th year anniversary of the demise of the passenger pigeon, I’ve stopped and thought of Martha. She is a symbol and a lesson for us all, and we should remember her significance.

    When climate change deniers say “man is not powerful enough to change the climate” – we can point to Martha.  When oil and gas companies claim their clearing, drilling and chemical fracking on pristine lands can’t poison the landscapes and destroy habitat for man and wildlife – remember Martha. When we helplessly observe massive poaching for ivory, rhino horn and bush meat in Africa and watch great species like elephant, lion and the great apes disappear in our lifetimes – Martha again.

    North Africa, Easter Island, the Gulf of Mexico, the great forests of North America, the Amazon – how many places and species must we destroy all the while claiming they are indestructible? Little Martha, the last of billions of her kind, should live forever as a symbol of man’s foolish arrogance, carelessness and greed.  Sadly, she has a lot of company as the last of so many species silently and anonymously meet their demise every day under mankind’s rapid advance through all the Earth’s fragile ecosystems.

  5. greenmatters Thanks for this comment to the article. I appreciate your way of honoring Martha and all the passenger pigeons and it’s a great reminder and lesson as well.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ERROR: si-captcha.php plugin: GD image support not detected in PHP!

Contact your web host and ask them to enable GD image support for PHP.

ERROR: si-captcha.php plugin: imagepng function not detected in PHP!

Contact your web host and ask them to enable imagepng for PHP.

Related Videos

Related Content