FacebookTwitterYoutubeInstagramGoogle Plus

Five Legitimate Scientific Controversies


With our minute-by-minute news cycle and omnipresent social media, you’d be excused for thinking evolution and climate change are hot controversies among scientists. They’re not: Darwin’s theory and evidence of global warming are well established and accepted by the vast majority of researchers. But tackling real controversies head-on is at the heart of the scientific process. These five ongoing debates are just a few of the contentious conversations that continue to perplex and intrigue scientists today.

How should we measure quantum mechanics?

Measurement is everything in quantum mechanics, and for more than a century, physicists have argued about the correct way of doing it. In the 1920s, Danish physicist Niels Bohr and his colleagues devised the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, holding that all atomic particles exist in all states until they are observed (or measured) in specific positions. Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger countered with a hypothetical situation in 1935: a cat is placed in a sealed box with a bit of radioactive material, a Geiger counter and a jar of poison. When the radioactive material decays, the Geiger counter beeps, and triggers the release of the poison, killing the cat. But according to the Copenhagen interpretation, the radioactive material could be both decayed and not decayed until we measure it; therefore the cat could be both alive and dead until we open the box. “Schrödinger’s Cat” exposed the bugs in the Copenhagen interpretation when it’s applied to practical, real-life situations, and physicists continue to disagree over the right way to measure quantum particles (sometimes on the stage of the World Science Festival). But no cats were ever harmed in the debate.

Can we clone extinct species?

Great auks, dodo birds and passenger pigeons are just three of many species that have recently gone extinct thanks to human activity. Modern cloning technology could, theoretically, make it possible to resurrect extinct organisms using DNA extracted from specimens in museum collections. Proponents of cloning argue that bringing back long-gone fauna would allow us to study their genomes and offer clues to genetic vulnerabilities in endangered species today. But opponents say it’s not that easy. Resurrecting organisms is a deeply imperfect process, even with fresh DNA from living animals. Dolly, the cloned sheep, emerged only after years of failed experiments. Cloned organisms also bear genetic abnormalities that limit their survival chances. While cloning and other genetic technologies may improve in the future, don’t pin your hopes on a real-life Jurassic Park just yet (especially since it’s probably impossible for scientists to extract even a smidgen of dinosaur DNA).

Is red wine really good for your health or not?

Oenophiles cried vive le vin! when studies in the 2000s suggested that resveratrol, an antioxidant compound in grape skin and chocolate, was the key to the “French paradox”—the fact that the French have low rates of heart disease despite their cholesterol-heavy diets. Antioxidants protect cells from damage, thus slowing or preventing illness. But according to the Mayo Clinic, you’d need to consume 1,000 liters of Bordeaux a day to get a dose of resveratrol equivalent to what the lab mice got, and whether those benefits can translate to humans is hotly debated. Recent studies on animals have found that resveratrol may help prevent and/or treat diabetes, some cardiovascular problems and cancer, but studies with human subjects have not found any blockbuster effects so far. And in 2012, leading resveratrol researcher Dipak Das of the University of Connecticut retracted more than 100 published studies on resveratrol in which he had fudged results. So, though the American Heart Association says a daily glass of wine won’t hurt you, resveratrol may not be the fountain of youth.

Do parallel universes exist?

Other realities probably won’t resemble the Seinfeld episode with Bizarro Jerry, George and Kramer (or the bearded denizens of the evil Star Trek reality),but parallel universes may actually exist. According to string theorist and World Science Festival co-founder Brian Greene, the hypothetical multiverse spans all time, matter, space and energy. Our known universe may be just one of several connected by particle “strings.” Similarly, the “many worlds” theory of quantum mechanics, proposed by Hugh Everett, suggests that all of the observations within a range of probabilities correspond to different universes. Prominent physicists like Stephen Hawking and Michio Kaku also believe that parallel universes are mathematically possible. But many scientists aren’t quite convinced, saying that the theory of the multiverse is untestable, relegating it more to philosophy or science fiction than actual science (this is another debate that you can see on the World Science Festival stage).

“Invoking an infinity of unseen universes to explain the unusual features of the one we do see is just as ad hoc as invoking an unseen Creator,” Arizona State University physicist Paul Davies wrote in a New York Times piece. “The multiverse theory may be dressed up in scientific language, but in essence it requires the same leap of faith.”

But Stanford University physicist Andrei Linde argues that the multiverse is the best way to provide a rational explanation for the way that this universe seems to be fine-tuned to promote the existence of life. If the masses of protons and electrons were just a little bit different, for example, life as we know it wouldn’t exist. If there was just one universe, “we would need to speculate about the divine cause making the universe custom built for humans,” Linde wrote at Edge.org. “Meanwhile, in the multiverse consisting of many different parts with different properties, the correlation between our properties and the properties of the part of the world where we can live makes perfect sense.”

Most multiverse skeptics don’t deny that there may be aspects to the universe that are beyond our line of sight. But they think that answers to the stubborn questions that prompted the development of multiverse theory—such just how and why the Big Bang shaped space-time the way it did—are likely to be found in the one universe that we can be completely sure exists: our own.

What killed the dinosaurs?

About 65 million years ago, the last Triceratops bit the dust—but paleontologists still don’t agree on why it died. Here are the facts: global climate change as well as short-term changes in precipitation, temperature and sunlight took place at the end of the Cretaceous period and beginning of the Paleogene (formerly Tertiary) period. At that time, 70 percent of life on Earth, including dinosaurs, went extinct. And that’s where consensus ends. One school of thought maintains that the cause of this mass extinction was “intrinsic:” a combination of devastating volcanoes and Earth’s shifting plate tectonics over a few million years eventually killed the dinosaurs and most marine life. The other, “extrinsic” explanation suggests that a colossal meteorite slammed into Earth. The impact then unleashed a cloud of iridium, still visible in the geologic record, as well as sudden, deadly climate change. Even today, researchers are unearthing new clues to the dinosaurs’ demise.



  1. The existence of dark matter and dark energy is a settled question? Wow, that was fast. The acceleration of distant galaxies was only discovered in 1998. Dark matter and energy were created to explain the effect. Somebody has been sniffing the aether again. If something which hasn’t been directly observed or quantified in any verifiable way, doesn’t qualify as an unsettled question, then what does? the Uncertainty principle, Jurassic park, red wine, pocket universes or bizarre stringy stuff and what happened to the Flintstones?  Humans are never as clever as they think themselves. Much, much less than 1% is known. Most of the questions in science are unsettled, if not they are the wrong questions.

  2. Robert A Dorrough Actually, the  most likely reason dark matter and dark energy didn’t make the list is that we don’t know enough for there to be a controversy. In order for something to be a controversy, there have to be multiple reasonable explanations with competing evidence. For example, for dark matter, we know that the motions of stars within galaxies shows more mass than we can account for with the regular matter we can see in any electromagnetic frequency, but we don’t have any strong contenders for what that missing matter consists of, so it’s more of an open question than a controversy.

  3. The controversial topics are the ones that make the most interesting listening at the WSF

  4. Chemonuclear Fusion is a
    type of low energy nuclear fusion that has been shown to produce
    energy in two experiments. Aneutronic nuclear fusion can provide
    unlimited electric power without polluting the environment with
    radioactive waste and greenhouse emissions. Chemonuclear processes in
    small dense white dwarf stars accelerate the rate of nuclear fusion
    and cause them to explode in spectacular supernova explosions.
    mission of the Chemonuclear Fusion Project is to raise awareness of
    this new and vitally important source of environmentally clean energy
    and to promote research and development.
    The Chemonuclear
    Fusion Project is soliciting volunteers to help our crowdfunding and
    educational campaigns. Our crowdfunding webpages will soon be up and
    running. We want people to post to discussion groups and help us get
    the word out that aneutronic chemonuclear fusion might be the
    radiation free way to power the world if we can get the funding to
    build and test reactors.
    Artists can help us design T-shirts,
    mugs, and promotional items to sell and give away to our
    contributors. Writers to write promotional materials and post to web
    forums are also wanted. Video producers and professional and amateur
    scientists who can help the public understand the concepts of
    chemonuclear fusion are encouraged to contact us also.

    Visit our facebook page
    and give us a like. We welcome your comments and questions!

  5. Let me make sure I have this straight: 65 million years ago a meteorite slammed into a box containing a cat and a small amount of radioactive material. The cat and the radioactive material exploded and caused the Big Bang, which turned the cat into multicats and “dark matter” (and, with cats, I think we all know what that is!). It was then this endless army of visible, semi-visible, invisible, and possibly dead cats, drunk on red wine, attacked and killed all the dinosaurs, who are secretly trying to clone themselves using the small wrenches, screwdrivers, drills and other tools used in quantum mechanics. Is that close enough for Einstein, or does there have to be some math involved?

  6. Well we learnt last week that the real reason the dinosaurs died out, was because the creators of the Transformers used the Seed and converted all organic material on earth into transformium….

  7. There are not the doubts but proofs of adopted paradigm of physics is fundamentally incorrect. There is a standing open challenge to that effect athttp://www.worldsci.org/php/index.php?tab0=Abstracts&tab1=Display&id=6476&tab=2 and athttp://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gsjournal.net%2FScience-Journals%2FEssays%2FView%2F4018&h=QAQEIi6un&s=1. All forces of nature are electromagnetic forces transmitted through aether. Even Dark Matter is nothing but aether which is proved to be existing in the published paper “Michelson-Morley Experiment: A Misconceived & Misinterpreted Experiment” available at journal sitehttp://www.indjst.org/index.php/indjst/article/view/30182. Besides Big Bang Theory including Cosmic Inflation has been mathematically, theoretically & experimentally proved as baseless in the published paper “Experimental & Theoretical Evidences of Fallacy of Space-time Concept and Actual State of Existence of the Physical Universe” which is available at the journal site athttp://l.facebook.com/l.php?u=http%3A%2F%2Findjst.org%2Findex.php%2Findjst%2Fissue%2Fview%2F2885&h=9AQGEgQpS&s=1.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

ERROR: si-captcha.php plugin: GD image support not detected in PHP!

Contact your web host and ask them to enable GD image support for PHP.

ERROR: si-captcha.php plugin: imagepng function not detected in PHP!

Contact your web host and ask them to enable imagepng for PHP.

Related Videos

Related Content