In movies, time travel methods are mostly explained along the lines of “something something plutonium something wormhole.” But physicists do have some idea of methods that might allow for actual time travel—though they might not necessarily prevent you from killing your own grandfather.
One trope in time travel science fiction is slightly plausible, if physically impossible—traveling faster than the speed of light. The crew of the U.S.S. Enterprise did this in Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home, by using the sun’s gravitational pull to accelerate their spaceship to super-light speed. If it were possible to travel faster than light (Einstein calculated it would take an infinite amount of power), it is theoretically possible for signals to be sent back in time; it’s questionable if the same method could work with people.
What about going forward in time by going really fast? Any roundtrip travel of any length will send you a little bit further into the future than your chronological aging would imply, since time dilation occurs at any speed (in fact, an astronaut on a six-month mission aboard the International Space Station will have aged .007 seconds less than everyone on earth, even with time dilation from gravitation working to counter the effect by slightly speeding up time). With a very fast ship, moving closer to the unattainable speed of light, you could increase this difference: Spend a few decades traveling, and you might arrive at your destination to find that centuries have passed since you left.
In 2011, faster-than-light travel appeared closer to reality than ever (for particles, anyway); CERN scientists thought they’d found subatomic particles traveling faster than the speed of light. But the measurement was later found to be an error, possibly due to a faulty connection between a GPS unit and a computer.
Wormholes are another conceivable route for traveling backwards and forwards through time. In the 1960s, New Zealand mathematician Roy Kerr calculated under the right conditions, a spinning star can collapse not into a point, but into a ring; if something passed through this ring, it might travel through a tunnel in spacetime called an Einstein-Rosen bridge, or wormhole. The two ends of the wormhole might connect to different universes, or to different points in the same universe (separated by time as well as space). Scientists have yet to actually find evidence for wormholes, but they do square with Einstein’s theory of gravity. Caltech physicist Kip Thorne took the theory of wormholes to another level later, showing that if you can move the openings around, the entrances and exits can exist at different moments in time.
Frank Tipler, an astronomer, came up with another possible method of time travel that might work for actual space travelers, though building it is a bit of a tall order: First, you need a chunk of matter 10 times the mass of the sun. Then you roll it up into a cylinder, and set it spinning to a few billion rotations per minute. Stuff that travels in a precise spiral around the cylinder could end up on a closed timelike curve, a weird twist of spacetime that sends you on a loop back to the time where you entered it. But constructing one of these Tipler cylinders is going to take some time, as it has to be of infinite length.
Assuming you make it back to the past, what happens if you kill an ancestor of yours? Do you cease to exist? Does you ceasing to exist then mean you don’t go back in time in the first place to kill your grandfather? Russian physicist Igor Novikov developed a theory called the Self-Consistency Principle, under which the odds of any action that you might take creating a time paradox are zero.
“There is no global division of events on closed timelike curves into future and past,” Novikov wrote in the book Black Hole Physics. “Not only the future is a result of evolution of the past, but the past is a result of the future also… all events on closed timelike curves influence each other around the closed timelike line in a self-adjusted way.”
So it’s impossible to change the past because you’ve already been there in the past, taking actions that resulted in your future-present. Not all physicists (or philosophers, given the implications of Novikov’s principle on free will) agree; some think that actions during time travel may create new timelines (as seen in Back to the Future II; for more on theories of alternate universes, check out the World Science Festival program “Multiverse: One Universe or Many?”). Whichever theory of timelines you subscribe to, it’s probably best to play it safe and not kill anyone.
By: Roxanne Palmer
Sign up for our free newsletter to see exclusive features and be the first to get news and updates on upcoming WSF programs.
Please read the community guidelines before posting.
I've given myself headaches while thinking about the timelines in time-travel movies. For instance, if Marty McFly and Jennifer left for the future in 1985, time would have progressed in Hill Valley without them being there..so they wouldn't have been able to meet themselves in 2015, since they would have been missing for 30 years. Right?
Or, wouldn't the Terminator have eliminated himself by destroying his chip in T2, having changed the future? I understand the multi-universe theories, but that kind of makes his mission of saving the kid and destroying his own prototype chip pointless, doesn't it? And wouldn't Cyberdine just keep sending Terminators back in time, perhaps a day earlier each time, when it becomes obvious in the future that the original Terminator had failed?
As I said, headaches.
if anyone could go back or forward in time they would go somewhere when the world was in Trouble or when something amazing was happening Like watching the Pyramids being Built.*
But if time travel is realized at any point in the future, wouldn't we know about it at this point in time?
Actual fact: the London Times recently published an article begging time travelers NOT to kill Hitler, on the grounds that everything turned out okay with having him around. So help me.
Houston, we have a problem. The "Back to the Future" series arcs do not include the trips to/from the 1870s, which was the premise of BTTF3.
@BillScheitzach not so! the timeline is logarithmic, so you can see the lines extending up from 1950 actually are going to 1885, which is the date of the travel back in time in the 3rd movie.
@Swapnil K That movie was just too complicated to include in this infographic. There does exist this graphic:
which explains it, but good luck making any sense of it. :)
Suppose that you only go back in time a few days or years. Do you have to avoid yourself? Or are you the only 'you'?
if we human think we messed Up the Planet ..just wait Until we Figure out how to time Travel!!-> we will really Screw up peoples Lives!~O:"=